Illuminating the mysteries of this world and the next, now and in the past.
RSS:
Publications
Comments

Flickering Torches now available on iPhone and other mobile devices


The bleeding edge. If it bleeds it leads, so the media wonks say, and Flickering Torches is doing its part to live up to its crimson color scheme. As of today, Flickering Torches provides a custom version of the website to iPhone users, as well as many other common small screen devices, including PDAs and smartphones.

When iPhone or other mobile device users access http://www.flickeringtorches.com, they will be presented with a specially formatted version of the website that is custom made for the small screen form factor and includes the familiar interface options users have come to expect from mobile solutions.

Flickering Torches provides this functionality courtesy WPTouch. Modeled after Apple’s app store design specs, WPtouch loads lightning fast and automatically transforms Flickering Torches into a web-application experience when viewed from all models of iPhone, iPod touch, Android, Palm Pre, and BlackBerry Storm as well as other touch mobile devices. Loads times are decreased by an average of 72%!

WPTouch selects which version of Flickering Torches to display based on your device’s “user-agent”. The user-agent is a keyword like those on the list that tells Flickering Torches what kind of device you are using to view the website. For example, the Dell Axim x51v running Windows Mobile 5 and Internet Explorer Mobile 4.01 sends the user-agent “ppc”.

The device user-agents currently supported are: android, aspen, blackberry9500, blackberry9530, cupcake, dream, incognito, iphone, ipod, opera mini, ppc, webmate, and webos. If your device uses a different user-agent code, contact me and I’ll add it to the list. If you are using a PDA or smartphone and are seeing the desktop version of the website, check with your device’s user community and find the user-agent and then let me know.

A little blue birdie told us

Flickering Torches has joined the 140 character club. That’s right, you can follow this site on Twitter now. New functionality has been added to the website to automatically tweet links to new articles as they become available. I also added TweetMeme, for ReTweeting posts directly.

Additional functionality for our notification system users

In addition to mobile device compatibility for display of the website itself, Flickering Torches has also installed the Prowl API, giving you access to the notification features of Growl on your iPhone via Prowl while browsing the website.

Growl is a notification system for Mac OS X and is now available for Windows: it allows applications that support Growl, such as Prowl, to send you notifications.

Notifications are a way for your applications to provide you with new information, without you having to switch from the application you’re already in.

Growl handles the job of displaying these notifications, so that applications don’t have to all do it themselves. When you start up a Growl-enabled application, it will “just work.” Your apps can start displaying notifications right away.

Prowl is the Growl client for the iPhone OS. Notifications from your computer are sent to your iPhone or iPod touch using “push”, a built-in feature of your device. You can also forward notifications to email, Twitter, and social bookmarking sites.

Get your adds over here

Flickering Torches now offers the AddThis widget for reposting links to our articles on your favorite social networking sites, including Twitter, Facebook and MySpace. AddThis includes destinations from all over the world, including Digg, Menéame, Hatena, and Nujij — and even utilities like Print, Translate, and PDF Online. Over 200 services are supported in over 50 languages.

Feedback requested

As the developer of this website, I’m always interested in finding new ways to extend its functionality. Am I missing a feature you think Flickering Torches should have? Tell me about it or leave a comment below. I’d also appreciate feedback on how the site formatting looks on your mobile device. Thanks! Hope you’re enjoying the website! I wouldn’t mind a comment about that either!  :mrgreen:

Bookmark and Share

A new way to tell when clients lie about their paranormal experience


By Dr. Amir Gilat and Michael Breckenridge

Every time an investigator goes out to visit a client, there is the possibility that the situation has been misinterpreted or exaggerated by the client, due to actual fear or simply watching too many ghost hunting shows. Lurking in the shadows is a third possibility – the client is lying. The will to deceive transcends time and culture, and has been the source of much research through the years, from interrogation techniques to polygraphs. Now there is a new technology for ferreting out less than truthful written accounts of paranormal circumstances.

Various cognitive characteristics in written falsities are distinctly different from those that are exposed in truthful writing. This has been revealed in new research carried out by the Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences at the University of Haifa, Israel. These differences can be identified by a computerized writing-analysis system that can measure differences in pressure on the page, duration of the pen on and off the page and the flow of writing.

“It seems that the act of writing a false text involves extensive cognitive resources and the automatic act of writing is thereby affected,” said Dr. Gil Luria of the Department of Human Services and Dr. Sara Rosenblum of the Department of Occupational Therapy who carried out the research.

Despite the need and desire that most people have to identify lies, it has always been a difficult and complex task. The tools available today, such as the polygraph, are still problematic. While the polygraph attempts to identify physiological changes, the current study has examined whether the act of lying causes cognitive changes. This approach is based on the assumption that lying – writing lies in this particular case – requires special resources and causes cognitive stress, which in turn affects performance that would otherwise be carried out automatically.

The participants in the study were asked to write two paragraphs. First they were told to describe an event that really took place and then to give a description of an event that did not really occur. The participants wrote the paragraphs with an electronic pen on a page that was placed on an electronic board. The data was analyzed with the help of a program that Dr. Rosenblum developed a few years ago. The system is able to garner data that cannot be measured manually, such as pressure, rhythm and speed, duration and frequency.

The study reveals that pressure on the page when writing deceptive content is significantly heavier than when writing the truth. Likewise, the flow of strokes when writing false text, as expressed in the height and length of the letters, is distinctly different from these elements in truthful writing. According to the researchers, the results of the study show that when writing a lie, otherwise automatic acts become more controlled by the brain and consequently performance is altered, which is expressed in the size, duration and pressure of the false writing.

The research points to the importance of carefully studying not just what the clients’ words say on an interview questionnaire, but the look and form of the handwriting itself from one section to another, and the feel of it through the back side of the paper, betraying pen pressure differences. Changes in writing style as discovered by the study may hint at something not told or intentionally misdirected.

“A lie detector that analyses handwriting has many advantages over the existing detectors, since it is less threatening for the person being examined, is much more objective and does not depend on human interpretation. The system also provides measures that the individual has difficulty controlling during performance. This is certainly a system that can improve – alongside the existing detectors – our ability to identify lies,” the researchers concluded.

Even though the research has not yet produced a device for mass production, the knowledge about the perceptible differences in truthful versus deceptive writing gained from the study can be useful to investigators who suspect fraud and would like a subtle test to use without alarming or offending clients.

Bookmark and Share

A 4,000 year old dead man awakens


By Eske Willerslev

For the first time an ancient genome of an extinct human being has been reconstructed in detail, giving a forensic look at a man from the forgotten past.

Professor Eske Willerslev and his PhD student Morten Rasmussen, from Centre of Excellence in GeoGenetics, The Natural History Museum at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, led the international team of scientists responsible for the findings.

Mugshot and side profile of Inuk, an ancient man of Greenland, sketched by Nuka Godfredtsen.

Mugshot and side profile of Inuk, an ancient man of Greenland, sketched by Nuka Godfredtsen.

Professor Willerslev, 38, and his team grabbed international attention last year when they reconstructed the complete mitochondrial genomes of a woolly mammoth and an ancient human. However, the current discovery is the first time scientists have been able to reconstruct the 80% of the nuclear genome that is possible to retrieve from fossil remains. From the genomic sequences, the team has managed to construct a picture of a male individual who lived in Greenland 4,000 years ago and belonged to the first culture to settle in the New World Arctic.

The discovery was made by analyzing a tuft of hair that belonged to a man from the Saqqaq culture from north-western Greenland 4,000 years ago. The scientists have named the ancient human “Inuk”, which means “man” or “human” in Greenlandic. Although Inuk is more closely related to contemporary north-eastern Siberian tribes than to modern Inuits of the present day New World Arctic, the scientists wants to acknowledge that the discovery was made in Greenland.

Professor Willerslev discovered the existence of the hair tuft by coincidence after several unsuccessful attempts to find early human remains in Greenland.

“I was speaking with the Director of the Natural History Museum in Denmark, Dr. Morten Meldgaard, when we started discussing the early peopling of the Arctic,” Willerslev said. “Meldgaard who had participated in several excavations in Greenland told me about a large tuft of hair, which was found during an excavation in north-western Greenland in the 1980’s and now stored at the National Museum in Denmark.

“After the Greenland National Museum and Archives granted permission, we analyzed the hair for DNA using various techniques and found it to be from a human male. For several months, we were uncertain as to whether our efforts would be fruitful. However, through the hard work of a large international team, we finally managed to sequence the first complete genome of an extinct human.

“It was crucial that a private person, Fredrik Paulsen, chairman of the medical company Ferring, became interested in the project and provided the necessary funding to run some pilot tests, and that The Lundbeck Foundation of Denmark, quickly followed up providing substantial economic support to complete the project.

“It shows how crucial private funding is to basic science these days. Without these private donors it would have taken us a lot longer to sequence the first ancient human genome.”

The reconstruction serves as blueprint that scientists can use to give a description of how the prehistoric Greenlander, Inuk, looked – including his tendency to baldness, dry earwax, brown eyes, dark skin, the blood type A+, shovel-shaped front teeth, and that he was genetically adapted to cold temperatures, and to what extend he was predisposed to certain illnesses. This is important as besides four small pieces of bone and hair, no human remains have been found of the first people that settled the New World Arctic. Willerslev’s team can also reveal that Inuk’s ancestors crossed into the New World from north-eastern Siberia between 4,400 and 6,400 years ago in a migration wave that was independent of those of Native Americans and Inuit ancestors. Thus, Inuk and his people left no dependence behind among contemporary indigenous people of the New World.

“Previous efforts to reconstruct the mammoth nuclear genome resulted in a sequence filled with gaps and errors due to DNA damage because the technology was in its infancy. The genome of Inuk is comparable in quality to that of a modern human,” Willerslev said. “Our findings can be of significant help to archaeologists and others as they seek to determine what happened to people from extinct cultures. Doing so requires organic material – bones or hair kept as museum pieces or found at archaeological sites. Previously, the DNA needed to have been frozen or buried in a layer of permafrost. But with the new methods developed here at the Centre, that is not a premise anymore.”

Much of the hands-on work analysing and joining the DNA sequences and the chemical analyses of what little was left of the damaged genetic material together to form a complete profile of Inuk was done by Morten Rasmussen. The work was carried out in close collaboration with other scientists at the University of Copenhagen and in China, where they have far more sequencing machines than in Denmark.

“Not so long ago, reconstructing an entire modern human genome took years,” Rasmussen said. “But the new methods and the abundance of sequencing machines allow us to do it in just a few months – and that includes the time-consuming task of analyzing the results. The interesting thing about compiling a human genome is that we can look at the genes to see traits like why Scandinavians are blond, why some are predisposed to certain illnesses and why others more easily become addicted to alcohol or tobacco. But the genome we’ve reconstructed is no Frankenstein’s Monster; it’s more like we’ve got the blueprints for a house, but we don’t know how to build it.”

The results of the team’s research will be published in the leading British scientific journal Nature.

Bookmark and Share